mklaurence@gmail.com
10-19-2007, 06:58 PM
Hello all,
I am planning on ordering some deluxe photo books. The size specs on MyPublisher's website say that these are 15" x 11.5", and they also note that the suggested image resolution for a full-bleed deluxe-size image is 2560x1920.
According to some postings I've read in the forums, the printing is at 175 LPI. We would prefer our resolution to be 2x the LPI, if I'm not mistaken, so:
Width: 15" x 175 LPI x 2 = 5250 pixels
Height: 11.5" x 175 LPI x 2 = 2012.5 pixels
So theoretically, wouldn't this be the "best" resolution to use? I understand that most people don't have cameras that can reproduce at 5250 pixel width (I sure don't!)... but I wonder if upsizing from 3,872 pixels (my highest camera res) using Alien Skin Blow Up or something like that and then sharpening would produce better info for the RIP to process than shrinking the pixel data all the way down to 2560.
Anyone have any thoughts?
...maybe I should order two books, one done by each procedure and compare ;-)
I am planning on ordering some deluxe photo books. The size specs on MyPublisher's website say that these are 15" x 11.5", and they also note that the suggested image resolution for a full-bleed deluxe-size image is 2560x1920.
According to some postings I've read in the forums, the printing is at 175 LPI. We would prefer our resolution to be 2x the LPI, if I'm not mistaken, so:
Width: 15" x 175 LPI x 2 = 5250 pixels
Height: 11.5" x 175 LPI x 2 = 2012.5 pixels
So theoretically, wouldn't this be the "best" resolution to use? I understand that most people don't have cameras that can reproduce at 5250 pixel width (I sure don't!)... but I wonder if upsizing from 3,872 pixels (my highest camera res) using Alien Skin Blow Up or something like that and then sharpening would produce better info for the RIP to process than shrinking the pixel data all the way down to 2560.
Anyone have any thoughts?
...maybe I should order two books, one done by each procedure and compare ;-)